Author URLs
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-4-2013
Subject: LCSH
Juvenile delinquency
Disciplines
Criminology and Criminal Justice | Psychology
Abstract
The Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-Version 2 (MAYSI-2) is a brief screening tool used to identify youth in the juvenile justice system that are at-risk for mental health related difficulties. The MAYSI-2 was administered to 5,205 African American and Latino/a youth throughout Chicago, Illinois who were on probation and residing in the community. This study investigated differences (i.e., legal status, gender, age, race/ethnicity) in reporting of mental health symptoms and substance use on the MAYSI-2. Females scored above the clinical cutoffs more frequently than males and there were few differences found between diverted and adjudicated youth. Age comparisons revealed mixed results. Overall, youth in the current sample scored above the clinical cutoffs less often than youth in the MAYSI-2 norm reference groups. Nonetheless, during the first phase of this study the MAYSI-2 demonstrated effectiveness by accurately identifying a substantial portion of youth in need of mental health and/or substance abuse treatment.
DOI
10.1177/0093854813505565
Repository Citation
Coker, Kendell; Wernsman, Jamie; Ikpe, Uduakobong N.; Brooks, Jeannie S.; Bushell, Lynn; and Kahn, Barbara, "Using the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument–Version 2 on a Community Sample of African American and Latino/a Juvenile Offenders to Identify Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment Needs" (2013). Psychology Faculty Publications. 26.
https://digitalcommons.newhaven.edu/psychology-facpubs/26
Publisher Citation
Coker, K. L., Wernsman, J., Ikpe, U. N., Brooks, J. S., Bushell, L. L., & Kahn, B. A. (2013). Using the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument–Version 2 on a Community Sample of African American and Latino/a Juvenile Offenders to Identify Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment Needs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 0093854813505565. Published online before print November 4, 2013, doi: 10.1177/0093854813505565
Comments
This is the accepted version of the article published in Criminal Justice and Behavior. The published version can be found here.